Monthly Archives: June 2025

Trump v. CASA, Inc. is an Originalist Triumph

The Supreme Court’s Rebuke of Universal Injunctions: An Originalist Victory in Trump v. CASA, Inc. On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, decisively curtailed the use of universal (nationwide) injunctions in legal challenges to President Trump’s Executive Order No. 14160, which seeks to redefine birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment. From an originalist perspective, rooted in the Constitution and statutes like the Judiciary Act of 1789, this ruling stands as a triumph for confining judicial remedies to their historical limits, thereby preserving the separation of powers envisioned by…

Continue ReadingTrump v. CASA, Inc. is an Originalist Triumph

Friday Findings

Quick Takes: Friday Findings Welcome to today’s Quick Takes, where we dive into pressing issues with sharp analysis. First, we scrutinize Natasha Bertrand’s reporting on the DIA leaker controversy, questioning her credibility amid a history of selective narratives and conflicting evidence from the CIA, Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission, and the IAEA on Iran’s nuclear program. Next, we examine Zohran Kwame Mamdani’s rise as New York City’s Democratic mayoral nominee, weighing his progressive platform against accusations of inexperience and the risks of socialist policies, drawing lessons from the struggles of mayors like Chicago’s Brandon Johnson. Then, we explore Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s deportation…

Continue ReadingFriday Findings

Ensuring Election Integrity

Ensuring Election Integrity: The Case for Voter ID, the SAVE Act, Voter Roll Maintenance, and Stronger Penalties In an era of polarized politics and heightened scrutiny over electoral processes, the integrity of our elections is paramount. Free and fair elections are the bedrock of democracy, ensuring that every citi Quick Takes: Friday Findings Welcome to today’s Quick Takes, where we dive into pressing issues with sharp analysis. First, we scrutinize Natasha Bertrand’s reporting on the DIA leaker controversy, questioning her credibility amid a history of selective narratives and conflicting evidence from the CIA, Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission, and the IAEA on…

Continue ReadingEnsuring Election Integrity

Override the Parliamentarian

The Senate Parliamentarian’s Medicaid Ruling: A Procedural Roadblock for Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” As President Donald Trump pushes for his ambitious "Big, Beautiful Bill" to overhaul taxes and spending, a critical obstacle has emerged in the Senate: the rejection of key Medicaid provisions by Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough. These rulings, grounded in the arcane but powerful Byrd Rule, threaten to derail the GOP’s reconciliation strategy, forcing a reckoning over Senate procedure and historical precedent. Understanding the specific provisions at issue, the basis for MacDonough’s objections, and the rare history of overriding the parliamentarian provides crucial context for this high-stakes legislative battle.…

Continue ReadingOverride the Parliamentarian

An Originalist Perspective on Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic

An Originalist Perspective on Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic: State Sovereignty Triumphs in Medicaid Funding Dispute On June 26, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a 6-3 decision in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, upholding South Carolina’s authority to exclude Planned Parenthood from its Medicaid program without facing private lawsuits under 42 U.S.C. §1983. From an originalist perspective, the ruling reflects a faithful adherence to the original public meaning of §1983 (enacted in 1871) and the Spending Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the Constitution), reinforcing state sovereignty, judicial restraint, and legislative authority. This column explores the…

Continue ReadingAn Originalist Perspective on Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic

The Myth of Jobs Americans Won’t Do

Illegal Labor Undercuts Fair Wages The idea that there are "jobs Americans won't do" is a tired myth, one that’s been debunked by both economic reality and common sense. From dairy farms to landscaping, the notion that illegal immigrant labor fills an irreplaceable gap ignores a fundamental truth: pay a fair wage, and Americans will step up to the plate. The real issue is that illegal labor suppresses wages, distorting the market and pricing American workers out of jobs they’d otherwise take. It’s time to dismantle this narrative and recognize how reliance on illegal labor harms both workers and the broader…

Continue ReadingThe Myth of Jobs Americans Won’t Do

The Path to Sustainable Innovation

AI in Business: Ethics, Productivity, and the Path to Sustainable Innovation In the dynamic and transformative landscape of 2025, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a cornerstone of business innovation, fundamentally reshaping operational paradigms, enhancing decision-making processes, and unlocking new frontiers of efficiency. AI’s potential to revolutionize industries-from healthcare’s precision diagnostics to finance’s predictive analytics-is matched by a complex tapestry of ethical, operational, and societal challenges that demand rigorous scrutiny and strategic navigation. The promise of streamlined workflows, data-driven insights, and personalized customer experiences is tempered by risks such as algorithmic bias, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, data privacy concerns, and workforce displacement, each…

Continue ReadingThe Path to Sustainable Innovation

Midweek Mugwumps

Quick Takes: Midweek Mugwumps This week’s political landscape is marked by opportunism, constitutional missteps, and national security concerns. Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski’s flirtation with switching parties reveals a career driven by leverage rather than loyalty, while Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Jasmine Crockett’s calls for impeachment and war consultation expose Democratic infighting and constitutional ignorance. Meanwhile, U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy’s defiance of a Supreme Court ruling undermines the executive’s deportation efforts, threatening the rule of law. Finally, the Biden administration’s release of 729 Iranian nationals at the border raises alarms about vetting failures, amplifying risks in a tense U.S.-Iran climate.…

Continue ReadingMidweek Mugwumps

The War Powers Resolution is Unconstitutional

An Originalist Case Against the War Powers Resolution In the sweltering Philadelphia summer of 1787, the Framers of the Constitution grappled with a question that had plagued republics and monarchies alike: who should wield the power to wage war? Drawing on the lessons of European monarchs who dragged nations into ruinous conflicts, they sought to craft a system that balanced deliberate democratic consent with the need for swift action in times of crisis. The result, enshrined in Article I, Section 8, gave Congress the power to “declare War,” while Article II, Section 2 designated the President as “Commander in Chief” of…

Continue ReadingThe War Powers Resolution is Unconstitutional

Stepping on Rakes

The Democratic Party’s Perilous Path: Political Fallout from Missteps on Key Issues In the wake of the 2024 election and the early months of 2025, the Democratic Party finds itself ensnared in a deepening political crisis, a predicament born from a relentless series of strategic missteps that have steadily eroded its public standing and ignited internal discord. Much like a character in a slapstick comedy doomed to repeatedly step on a rake, the Democrats seem incapable of avoiding self-inflicted wounds, their focus on issues misaligned with voter priorities leaving them vulnerable to relentless Republican attacks and the growing disillusionment of their…

Continue ReadingStepping on Rakes