Blog

America’s Healthcare Finance Crisis

America’s Healthcare Finance Crisis: Challenges, Costs, and Solutions

America’s healthcare finance system faces a critical crisis, with Medicaid spending projected to rise from $1 trillion in 2025 to $1.4 trillion by 2034, straining budgets and threatening hospital viability. Safety-net hospitals, particularly in Medicaid expansion states, grapple with 55-65% uncompensated or low-compensated care, driven by uninsured patients, low Medicaid reimbursements, and U.S.-born children of illegal aliens (4.4 million, costing $35 billion annually). These children, granted citizenship under the 14th Amendment, inflate Medicaid costs. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA, 2025) introduces reforms-Medicaid cuts, noncitizen restrictions, work requirements, and immigration enforcement-but further measures, including codifying Executive Order 14160 through H.R. 569/S. 304 to restrict birthright citizenship and reforming the Affordable Care Act (ACA), could address root causes. The current Supreme Court is likely to uphold such legislation. This essay examines the healthcare finance crisis, its cost drivers, OBBBA’s solutions, and proposed reforms, arguing that codifying Executive Order 14160 and modifying the ACA, alongside systemic changes, are essential for sustainability and equity.

A System Under Strain

Medicaid, covering 94 million Americans (22%), costs $1 trillion in 2025, with the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projecting $1.4 trillion by 2034 due to enrollment growth and rising costs. The federal share (57-90% via Federal Medical Assistance Percentage, FMAP) burdens taxpayers, especially in 41 expansion states like California, where 15 million enrollees represent 40% of the population. Safety-net hospitals in sanctuary jurisdictions, such as Los Angeles (3.8 million), face 55-65% uncompensated or low-compensated care due to uninsured patients (8% nationally, 14.1% in non-expansion states) and Medicaid’s low reimbursement rates (70-80% of costs, causing a $24 billion shortfall). Since 2010, 136 rural hospitals have closed, limiting care access.

Ten non-expansion states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, Wyoming) leave 1.4 million adults in the coverage gap, with incomes too high for traditional Medicaid but too low for Marketplace subsidies. Only Georgia’s Pathways (3,499 enrolled) and Wisconsin’s BadgerCare (~200,000) offer alternatives, exacerbating uncompensated care. Illegal alien labor (11 million, 5% of the workforce) depresses wages for low-income citizens by 3-4% (Borjas, 2016), increasing poverty and Medicaid reliance in sanctuary jurisdictions (101.55 million population). These challenges demand urgent reform.

Drivers of Escalating Costs

The ACA’s Medicaid expansion added 18 million enrollees across 41 jurisdictions, extending eligibility to adults up to 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL). While reducing uncompensated care (e.g., California’s dropped 40%), it tied hospitals to Medicaid’s low reimbursements, fueling a $24 billion shortfall. Inefficiencies-high ER costs ($1,644 vs. $150 for primary care), price variation ($500-$5,000/procedure), and MCO administrative costs (12-18%, KFF 2023)-inflate spending. Able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs, ~10% of enrollees) strain Medicaid in expansion states like Illinois (12.5 million).

Illegal Alien Healthcare and Federal Cost-Sharing

Sanctuary states like California and New York (19.5 million) fund healthcare for illegal aliens, exacerbating costs. California’s Medi-Cal, expanded in 2024 to cover all eligible illegal aliens (700,000 enrollees), uses state general funds, costing over $4 billion annually for comprehensive care, including doctor visits and prescription drugs. Illegal aliens, limited to Emergency Medicaid ($3.8 billion nationally, <1% of spending), rely on emergency rooms ($1,644/visit, EMTALA-mandated) due to high uninsured rates (45-71%), contributing to 55-65% uncompensated care. Illegal enrollment, part of $88 billion in improper payments (HHS OIG, 2016), adds costs. Federal Emergency Medicaid, reimbursed at California’s 50% FMAP rate, indirectly passes costs to federal taxpayers, as hospitals receive federal funds for ER care used as primary care. California’s state-funded Medi-Cal reduces some ER reliance, but enrollment barriers (e.g., language, fear) sustain federal costs, with a $24 billion hospital shortfall. U.S.-born children of illegal aliens (4.4 million, 80% on Medicaid/CHIP) cost $35 billion annually, sustaining illegal alien presence and wage suppression.

OBBBA’s Reforms

Enacted on July 4, 2025, OBBBA cuts federal Medicaid spending by $1.02 trillion by 2034, increasing the uninsured by 7.8 million, and shifts costs to states, particularly sanctuary jurisdictions. It reduces FMAP from 90% to 80% for expansion states covering illegal aliens, saving $11 billion but shifting $92 billion to states like California if they maintain programs (2028-2034). Cost-sharing ($1,650/year for a family of four at $33,000 income) targets ACA expansion adults, sparing safety-net providers (FQHCs, RHCs). Noncitizen restrictions limit Medicaid to “qualified aliens” (e.g., legal residents) by October 2026, saving $0.8 billion by eliminating the 90-day “reasonable opportunity period” for verification. Work requirements mandate 20 hours/week for ABAWDs, risking 5.2 million disenrollments by 2034, increasing uncompensated care (10.3 million fewer enrolled). OBBBA’s $150 billion ICE funding ($100 billion by 2029), building on Executive Order 14157 (January 20, 2025, designating MS-13 as a Foreign Terrorist Organization), supports deportations, cutting illegal alien populations (e.g., 2 million in California), ER use, and wage suppression (3-4%).

Repealing or Modifying the ACA

The ACA, a primary cost driver, expanded Medicaid and mandated coverage, but its inefficiencies exacerbate the crisis. Repealing or modifying the ACA could realign healthcare finance.

  • Full Repeal: Repealing the ACA would eliminate Medicaid expansion, removing 18 million enrollees and saving $200-250 billion annually (CBO, 2023). However, this increases uncompensated care, as 10-12 million lose coverage, particularly in expansion states (e.g., California, 15 million enrollees). Non-expansion states (33.89 million) face minimal change but higher uninsured rates (14.1%). Repeal risks backlash, with 54% public approval of the ACA (KFF, 2025), and disrupts Marketplace subsidies (14 million enrollees), with 4.2 million more uninsured if enhanced tax credits expire in 2025.
  • Targeted Modifications: Partial reforms offer balance:
    • Reduce Expansion Scope: Lower eligibility to 100% FPL, saving $50-70 billion annually while covering 80% of current enrollees (CBO, 2023), reducing hospital reliance on low Medicaid rates.
    • Enhance State Flexibility: Grant waivers to tailor Medicaid (e.g., Georgia’s Pathways), saving $20-30 billion by aligning coverage with local needs.
    • Reform Subsidies: Cap Marketplace subsidies at 300% FPL, saving $15-20 billion, redirecting funds to primary care to cut ER reliance ($1,644/visit).
  • Feasibility: Full repeal faces a Senate filibuster (60 votes needed) and public opposition. Modifications, like prior waiver programs (e.g., Arkansas Works), are viable with bipartisan support. The Court’s conservative majority upheld ACA challenges (NFIB v. Sebelius, 2012) but may support state-led reforms post-Dobbs (2022).

Modifying the ACA could save $85-120 billion annually, stabilizing hospitals and complementing OBBBA.

Additional Proposed Reforms

To complement OBBBA and ACA reform, codifying Executive Order 14160 and other reforms address costs:

  1. Restrict Birthright Citizenship: Codifying Executive Order 14160 through H.R. 569/S. 304 (Birthright Citizenship Act, 2025) leverages Section 5’s authority to redefine “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” limiting citizenship to children with at least one citizen or legal resident parent, saving $5-10 billion annually by 2035 (300,000 births/year, 4.4 million citizen children cost $35 billion in 2025, Migration Policy Institute, 2023). An originalist view, citing Senator Jacob Howard’s 1866 exclusion of “foreigners, aliens,” supports this approach. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority (Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett) may uphold H.R. 569/S. 304 (5-4 or 6-3), given Dobbs (2022) and CASA v. Trump (June 2025). However, Wong Kim Ark (1898) applies until overturned, amended, or rendered moot by appropriate legislation under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment. Judicial review (3-5 years) is likely (City of Boerne v. Flores, 1997; Plyler v. Doe, 1982). An amendment (38 states) faces hurdles, with 26 Republican-led legislatures and 54% public support for birthright citizenship (Pew, 2025). Implementation costs $1-2 billion annually (CBO).
  2. Strengthen Verification: Enhanced SAVE/SSA checks could save $10-20 billion annually from $88 billion in improper payments, curbing illegal enrollment in sanctuary jurisdictions (e.g., New York, 19.5 million).
  3. Expand Telehealth and Preventive Care: Shifting care to primary settings ($150/visit) could save $50 billion (CMS, 2024), reducing uncompensated care (55-65%) in states like Texas (400,000 in coverage gap).
  4. Reform Reimbursement Rates: Aligning Medicaid with Medicare rates via block grants could save $15-20 billion, stabilizing hospitals (136 closures since 2010) in sanctuary jurisdictions (e.g., Philadelphia, 1.6 million).
  5. Promote State-Led Coverage: Enhanced FMAP for non-expansion states’ plans could save $10-15 billion, addressing 1.4 million in the coverage gap.
  6. Enforce Price Transparency: Capping MCO costs and enforcing CMS rules could save $30 billion (Health Affairs, 2022).

Impact of Restricting Birthright Citizenship

Codifying Executive Order 14160 via H.R. 569/S. 304 could save $5-10 billion annually by 2035, primarily in sanctuary jurisdictions like California (40% of mixed-status children). Emergency Medicaid ($3.8 billion) persists, and reduced Medicaid enrollment may increase uncompensated care (55-65%), as families turn to ERs ($1,644/visit). Non-expansion states (33.89 million, 14.1% uninsured) face heightened uncompensated care (1.4 million in coverage gap). Fewer citizen children could ease wage suppression (3-4%), though OBBBA’s ICE funding has a larger impact. Illegal aliens contribute $31.9 billion in taxes (2018), and fewer births may cut revenue. Public health risks ($1 billion for preventable diseases, CDC 2023) could rise.

Conclusion

America’s healthcare finance crisis, driven by ACA expansion, illegal alien costs ($35 billion for citizen children, $4 billion for Medi-Cal expansion), ABAWD overuse, and inefficiencies, demands bold reform. OBBBA’s $1.02 trillion Medicaid cuts, noncitizen restrictions, work requirements, and deportations shift costs to sanctuary jurisdictions (101.55 million), exacerbating hospital strain (55-65%) and wage suppression (3-4%). Non-expansion states (33.89 million) struggle with high uninsured rates (14.1%). Codifying Executive Order 14160 through H.R. 569/S. 304, likely upheld by the Supreme Court (5-4 or 6-3), could save $5-10 billion annually by 2035, but Wong Kim Ark applies until overturned, amended, or rendered moot by appropriate legislation under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment, facing judicial and political hurdles (54% public support for birthright citizenship). ACA modifications could save $85-120 billion annually. Combined with verification, telehealth, reimbursement alignment, state-led coverage, and transparency, these reforms could save $170-205 billion annually. By pairing targeted legislation with systemic changes, policymakers can stabilize healthcare finance, reduce state burdens, and ensure equitable access for low-income citizens, securing a sustainable future.

Like this post? Become a Citizen Producer!

James K. Bishop

James K. Bishop is a conservative writer and raconteur hailing from Texas, known for his incisive and often provocative takes on political and cultural issues. With a staunch commitment to originalist constitutional principles, he emphasizes limited government, individual liberties, and traditional American values. Active on X under the handle @James_K_Bishop, he frequently engages his audience with sharp critiques of progressive policies, media narratives, and overreaches by the federal government. His style is direct, often laced with humor and wit, which resonates strongly with his conservative followers.