Blog

Speak for Mackinac, Speak for America

Creaturehood and the American Character

I have a practice that keeps me honest.

From time to time I sit with the full weight of every oath I have ever sworn. Not the polished ones of adulthood, but the first ones: the clumsy, absolute promises of early childhood, the ones made when the world still felt straightforward and my word felt like the only currency that mattered. I do not treat them as relics. I treat them as live obligations. The man I am now must answer for the boy who made them. Circumstance matters. The light I had at the time matters. What does not matter is the modern temptation to rewrite the terms because my sensibilities have grown more sophisticated.

This practice is one of the ways I stay grounded in creaturehood. I am not the author of the moral order. I am a creature under a Creator who keeps the ledger. The vows were never private performance art. They were spoken into a reality that does not forget. That is why I reread the books that once shaped me. That is why I replay the decisive events of my life from the vantage of greater age. I am not chasing nostalgia. I am trying to see more clearly what was actually required of me under the light I actually had. Modern sensibilities do not get the final word. The record does.

Creaturehood is the name I give this recognition. Things have natures. Persons have natures. Places have natures. Nations have natures. Time itself has a nature all its own. None of them are infinitely plastic. None of them exist solely as raw material for the will of the present. The same metaphysical fact that makes a childhood oath binding is the fact that makes a people’s historic character non-negotiable. We are not gods inventing the world from scratch. We are stewards of what has been given. Forget that, and everything becomes negotiable, including the self.

The test of the principle arrived in the ordinary traffic of the day, and it arrived as a package.

Years ago, in a campaign video, Democrat Socialist Senate nominee in Michigan Abdul El-Sayed looked at Mackinac Island and delivered a judgment that still stands: a place that bans cars cannot be the most American place in Michigan. When the clip circulated again, he did not soften it. He doubled down. The island moves by horse and bicycle. It has kept that character through decades of pressure to modernize. To his eye this is disqualifying. Progress, after all, is supposed to look like asphalt and engines. Mackinac is required to become something else before it can be called American.

That same candidate, in the recent Michigan Democrat primary, drew 94.1 percent of the Arab vote while splitting the non-Arab vote almost evenly. Megan Basham called the pattern pure Islamic tribalism and said that is what we are importing. She is not wrong. Ordinary American ethnic affinity has always existed. This is something denser: a civilizational solidarity that does not begin from the American premise of ordered liberty under a common constitution.

These are not two separate facts. They are the same fact seen from different angles. The man who treats an inherited American place as provisional is the same man who receives near-unanimous support from a bloc whose primary loyalty is not to the American particularity he is dismissing. The demand that Mackinac abolish its nature in order to remain legitimate is of a piece with a politics that already regards the larger American character as optional or obstructive. When that politics is powered by 94 percent solidarity along ethnic-religious lines, the threat to the American creature becomes concrete rather than theoretical.

I name the front without the softer language. It is an Islamist-Marxist front. The ultimate theologies differ. The practical contempt for the given Western order does not. Both treat the existing culture as something to be cleared rather than tended. Both prefer the revolutionary claim over the received nature. Creaturehood is the refusal of that preference.

The defense of that refusal is not confined to familiar quarters. Justine Bateman put the principle with blunt clarity:

We don’t allow that here.

That is creaturehood spoken in the language of the present hour: freedom of religion, not freedom of law. The given American order is not a blank canvas for imported legal systems.

This is not a new American argument. Abraham Lincoln spoke it in the middle of the nation’s most terrible trial: “Fellow-citizens, we cannot escape history. We of this Congress and this administration will be remembered in spite of ourselves. No personal significance, or insignificance, can spare one or another of us. The fiery trial through which we pass will light us down, in honor or dishonor, to the latest generation.” He was not campaigning. He was answering for what had been entrusted. The last best hope of earth could be nobly saved or meanly lost. The responsibility could not be delegated to later, more enlightened generations.

Ronald Reagan returned to the same recognition at the end of his presidency. Standing at the window, he thought again of the shining city upon a hill. The phrase belonged first to John Winthrop, an early Pilgrim, an early freedom man, who crossed the ocean on a little wooden boat looking for a home that would be free. The city was never a claim of perfection. It was a claim of visibility and accountability. The world would watch what they made of the freedom they sought. Reagan understood that the city had a character worth preserving, not a progressive project under permanent renovation.

Both men spoke as if America itself were a creature—particular, given, charged with a responsibility that later generations could keep or forfeit. That is the thread. Creaturehood is why the culture must endure. It is not an arbitrary construction. It is the lived form of a people under obligation to the One who made them and to the fathers who handed the trust down. To treat it as disposable is to act as if we stand above the order of things rather than inside it.

Creaturehood is also how the culture will endure. Endurance does not come from endless adaptation to the latest ideology. It comes from fidelity to what was actually given. Places that keep their character. People who keep their vows. A nation that remembers it is not infinitely plastic. The political example is raised for one reason only: to defend what must be defended. The personal practice of facing every oath is the same fidelity, practiced first on the self.

The thread of creaturehood runs strong enough in me that I know when it is in danger. It is in danger. The demand that Mackinac become something else is the small version of the demand that America become something else. Both are forms of forgetting. Both treat the given as provisional. Both assume the present moment holds the final court.

I will not grant that assumption. To speak for Mackinac is already to speak for America. The same recognition that binds a man to the promises of his childhood binds a people to the character they actually received. Keep the oaths. Tend the given things. Refuse the dissolution. The Creator keeps the ledger at every scale.

Like this post? Become a Citizen Producer!

James K. Bishop

James K. Bishop is a conservative writer and raconteur hailing from Texas, known for his incisive and often provocative takes on political and cultural issues. With a staunch commitment to originalist constitutional principles, he emphasizes limited government, individual liberties, and traditional American values. Active on X under the handle @James_K_Bishop, he frequently engages his audience with sharp critiques of progressive policies, media narratives, and overreaches by the federal government. His style is direct, often laced with humor and wit, which resonates strongly with his conservative followers.